Illustrative sample report

See the evidence behind an AI visibility result.

This is example data showing the format only. It is not a measured result for a real pharmacy and must not be used as a ranking or outcome claim.

AI mentions50%6 of 12 controlled prompts
Own-domain citations25%3 of 12 prompts
Identity accuracy83%5 of 6 reviewed answers
Factual issues2Human-reviewed examples
Three actions

What the pharmacy should fix next.

Priority 1

Make the official pharmacy identity easier to verify

Evidence: The pharmacy was mentioned in 6 of 12 questions, but its own domain was cited in only 3.

Recommended action: Align the trading name, legal identity, domain and approved PharmacyScore profile across the authoritative pages.

Measure: Repeat the same dated prompts and compare mentions, citations and reviewed accuracy separately.

Priority 2

Clarify consultation and follow-up facts

Evidence: Two answers repeated an unclear description of what the service includes.

Recommended action: Publish one current, patient-facing service page with source-linked consultation, delivery and support facts.

Measure: Repeat the same dated prompts and compare mentions, citations and reviewed accuracy separately.

Priority 3

Review the sources competitors are earning

Evidence: Comparable pharmacies appeared in four prompts through regulator, directory and pharmacy-owned pages.

Recommended action: Check the cited sources for accuracy and decide which factual public evidence the pharmacy can improve or correct.

Measure: Repeat the same dated prompts and compare mentions, citations and reviewed accuracy separately.

Want your own?

Request a private pharmacy snapshot.

Get a free AI visibility snapshot